The Ivory Tower

This is a place for me to think out loud (or 'on paper') all things that are interesting me, and to comment on things I want to remember. Naming my blog the Ivory Tower is a joke on the popular notion that philosophy and intelligence are something beyond the common man, somehow above the 'mean' act of living as a human. Rand's refutation of this is what immediately drew me to her. Feel free to introduce yourself.

11.16.2005

Windfall Taxes

Last Wednesday the Senate called a group of representative executives of the oil industry to a meeting in Washington D.C. in which they were asked to justify the fact that they had made very large profits.

Even though it's been in the news a lot, I thought I'd just repeat that for the benefit of those of you who already heard about this but thought you had accidentally fallen into a Twilight Zone special in which Stalin and the pope team up to take over the world. Consider this a public service announcement; I assure you that you are still living in what is left of America, and this did actually happen.

In an interview on MSNBC Senator Ken Salazar (D-CO) accused oil executives of having "the highest profits that we've seen in history for the oil companies", contriving to make that a derogatory remark by also calling the profits "inexplicable". Scarborough echoed this sentiment by also labeling the oil prices, and subsequent profits, as inexplicable. (In related news Salazar and Scarborough are currently winning the People's Republic of America Award for invoking the vague concept of 'The People' the most times in an interview. See if you can find a more atrocious example and you'll win the vague concept of 'A Prize'!).

This opinion on the cause of profits is in line with the recent bustle about imposing a windfall profit tax on the oil companies. A windfall profit is money which one wasn't expecting, with the connotation that it was due to luck, eg. inheritance. A windfall tax is one-time direct tax on unexpectedly large profits. You see, if the profit is unexpected, inexplicable, then it isn't wrong to steal it because the oil companies didn't earn it to begin with. *wink, wink*

I haven't been able to find a reporter, a political commentator, or even an oil executive who will say it. So, I'll say it; these companies are selling a product. That means that they expend effort and/or capital to create a value and then trade it. This particular value that they create is at an extremely high demand. That is how they justify their profit, because there are a lot of people who are willing to pay what they charge for oil. And the reason they are morally entitled to all the profits is because they get the crude oil (by buying or collecting it), they refine it into gasoline, They do research in how to make it better, and they ship it to easily accessible stations for purchase. If you think I sound like the little red hen, then fantastic! That hen had a fucking point.

4 Comments:

At Monday, December 12, 2005 4:50:00 AM, Blogger emphaticdrivel said...

Are you seriously defending the outrageous profits that these oil companies are making… excuse me stealing from drivers? Just because people pay it, doesn’t mean that it is right. The price of gasoline is extremely inflated and it is for the greediest reasons you can think of. There is no good reason that gas should cost 20% more in the inner city than it does in the suburbs. By taxing the profits made by oil companies, controls are put on their price gouging. Come on now, 300 billion dollars in profits? We have to draw the line somewhere.

 
At Thursday, December 15, 2005 2:06:00 AM, Blogger Amanda Carlson said...

I am seriously defending it, I would have thought that were obvious.

I'm confused as to why you think that when one person pays another for a product and/or service there is some sort of theft going on. Where is this theivery of which you speak? Actually, it's because they pay that makes it right, otherwise it would be theft. I don't think you understand what stealing entails, you should look it up in a dictionary.

If there were no good reason that gas should cost as much as it does then I wouldn't be able to tell you one. So be amazed at my fantastic feats! Gas costs as much as it does because when the oil companies ask that much for it, lots of people willingly pay them. Congratualtions on your eloquently placed buzz-word, by the way, invoking the name of the "inner-city" makes you intelligent and knowledgable in politics and economy!

You say that controls should be put in place, that a line should be drawn. Putting aside the obvious inethical act of doing so, who would you say should do it; who is "we"? You? Some non-existent entity you've labeled the 'Consumer' or the 'People'? Or should the government handle such forced controls?

I know $300 billion; America is so awesome! ^_^

China's calling you, you should go. You may be happier there.

 
At Sunday, December 18, 2005 3:43:00 AM, Blogger emphaticdrivel said...

steal (verb): To seize, win, or gain by trickery, skill, or daring.

Exactly.

 
At Tuesday, December 20, 2005 4:55:00 PM, Blogger Amanda Carlson said...

I'm not sure how to respond to that. You seem to think you've made a point; yet all you have is an incorrect definition with no source listed and a one word defense of your argument. Please refrain from such sloppy communication or stop posting on my blog.

Simply taking or gaining something does no constitute theft, one may 'earn', or 'buy' or 'get' or 'create, etc. all without stealing. The defining trait of theft is that of taking without the right to do so.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home